Orphen Wrote:Um. Isn't this a hunters thread? I will assist.
HUnewearls- Just...no. Theyre crap. I don't even want to discuss them they suck so much. Want something better then a hunewearl, FOmar, even FOmarl.
HUcaseal- Pretty low HP, better ATP than those pitiful HUnewearls, but not as good as the HUmar and the HUcast. Low DEF, EVP is very high, ATA is practically of ranger calibur, in most cases people would tell you to simply use a ranger instead.
=/
HUnewearls/RAmarls are classed by most knowledgable players as the best classes for solo play and still great additions to a team with no decent support FO.
HUnewearls seem to be quite poor at very early levels, but at later levels they are easily one of the best classes. A hunter's ATP, ATA and DEF coupled with level 20 shifta/deband is deadly. As for HUcaseal's ATP being much better than the "pitiful" HUnewearl's, try checking the stats of a HUnewearl with level 20 shifta cast on them and then compare that with the HUcaseal's ATP
With regards to HUcaseal, their ATA isn't quite in the ranger league. Most people will tell you to use a RAcast instead because they are much better in almost all stats except EVP and have stupidly high HP, but RAmar and RAmarl would not be a decent alternative to a HUcaseal.
Orphen Wrote:Yeah, but the Hucasts have pretty horrible ATA.
No they do not. As discussed earlier, all hunters' ATA is more than enough in most cases.
Omar Wrote:=/
HUnewearls/RAmarls are classed by most knowledgable players as the best classes for solo play and still great additions to a team with no decent support FO.
HUnewearls seem to be quite poor at very early levels, but at later levels they are easily one of the best classes. A hunter's ATP, ATA and DEF coupled with level 20 shifta/deband is deadly. As for HUcaseal's ATP being much better than the "pitiful" HUnewearl's, try checking the stats of a HUnewearl with level 20 shifta cast on them and then compare that with the HUcaseal's ATP
With regards to HUcaseal, their ATA isn't quite in the ranger league. Most people will tell you to use a RAcast instead because they are much better in almost all stats except EVP and have stupidly high HP, but RAmar and RAmarl would not be a decent alternative to a HUcaseal.
No they do not. As discussed earlier, all hunters' ATA is more than enough in most cases.
Blah blah blah blah blah what do you know!
For solo play the HUcast is best because of his HP, DFP and ATP. Online the HUcast is still better but the difference is less. HUcaseals are great and okay but just can't match the HUcast. Why is her DFP and HP so low... she's an Android. She should have had at least higher HP and DFP than the HUmar. RAcaseals might even be better if you compare the stats.
zero2990 Wrote:Blah blah blah blah blah what do you know!
Evidently more than you, or you would actually have added something to this topic :|
I like useing my HUcast because even if a area starts out hard, I just lvl. up a few times and then I can blast through it.
I play with HUcaseal and I vote for HUcaseal!
YES, she has low defence but with good armor and shield..............
She has good POWER, ATA, EVP and she is FAST...!!!
She has enought HP to stay alive and traps rate is good....I know...!!!
Also I like female android
...........and her butt...ha ha ha
yes metal butts are the height of cool? :S
Anyway HUcast is still i think the best, he has what Hunters are supposed to have pwnaging ATP
definetly just put a God/arm on him and he'll be ready to go! lol