Forums

Full Version: Fomar vs Fomarl
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
flickynick Wrote:A FOmar has better ATP and MST
FOmarl has better HP, DFP, ATA (most important stat in game)
Kefka Wrote:FOmarl has better HP, DFP, ATA (most important stat in game)

But I don't think that your party would much enjoy the horrible damage you do with both attacks and techs...The only real advantage would be extended shifta and deband. I'm not saying I have anything against fomarls, but I am saying that I wouldnt put them before FOmars.
Orphen Wrote:I'm not saying I have anything against fomars, but I am saying that I wouldnt put them before FOmars.

What...? your confusing me.....
Whoops, Typo. gotta remember to spell-check still.. x_X
Kefka Wrote:FOmarl has better HP, DFP, ATA (most important stat in game)
But if you are going to be casting techs you don't need ATA, and if you have a weapon with decent hit%, you don't have to worry.
You can cast techs and still use ATA. My FOmarl uses guns regularly (specifically a Chaos Vulcan +8 and an Inferno Bazooka) and still finds time to split Pofuilly Slimes with lots of badly-timed Rabartas...
FOmarls because they are sexy Big Grin.
GOLDIE Wrote:FOmarls because they are sexy Big Grin.

Hahaha, and that would probably be one of the few reasons. Tongue
flickynick Wrote:But if you are going to be casting techs you don't need ATA, and if you have a weapon with decent hit%, you don't have to worry.
However 3/4 forces make good melee forces. So unless you're going to be a support force, accuracy is a key stat. Especially since that's what they don't excell in very well. FOmars especially.
My friend told me that fomars and fomarls, after learning reverser become more like healers, is it true??
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7