then which one am I? I dont use hacked items (to my knolegde), and I dont use game glitchs. (And im clueless about duping).
Being legit is hard to define i wouldnt call someone illegit if they had duped items or duped them themselves. Seeing that the item still had to be obtained at least once through hunting for it
The definition... there isn't one..
It is clear cut opinions...
If one does not know that they have a duped/hacked item, then they are still considered legit in my opinion...
though K'ma does have a poiint... a duped wep. still needs to be obtained...
"EYE OF THE BEHOLDER..."- that is the def. of legitness...
Well if you see a row of bombs and you hold the start button there s a glicth that you just expoilted Boom your not legit. There are too many bugs in the game for anyone to be legit.
actually, thats a good point... hmm, looks like im illegit then :S as much as i hate to say it, helios is right (gasps of horror
) but personally, i think you should still stay semi-legit by not actually using massive glitches (like duping)
I woudn't call duping massive becasue everyone can do it same with the bomb trick. Theres realy no such thing as being legit in this game all you can say is "I don't Hack" and thats it.
i suppose, but im pretty sure not many -legit-er's than though' will agree
The bomb glitch? Are you talking about pressing start and just running through not slowing yourself down for them, cuz then you don't target onto them? Cuz uh... I don't really see how that would be illegit...
But as I said before, tis all opinions, nothing more...
I wouldn't see taking advantage of the bomb glitch as illegit, exploiting bugs in a game is inevitable, sometimes even unavoidable, whilst editing the game's code isn't either of those.
There's an easily definable line there.
yeah, thats between hacking and not hacking. the question is wheres the the line between legit and illegit?