Forums

i agree with that opinion
but what about microsoft?

Well Microsoft is most likely the future, IMO.

All I can say is Super Smash Brothers Melee.

Both sony and microsofts catalogue is fairly limited and narrow. For this reason amongst others it has to be Nintendo(with sega a close second).

[SIZE=2]Nintendo made games are just fun to play, like they should be![/SIZE]

Yes, I've found that a lot of Sony's games have focused on difficulty and the gameplay collasped because of this. As for Microsoft... they just need to be educated on game creation.

Double Edge Wrote:Nintendo. After all, there'd be no Legend of Zelda if it weren't for Nintendo and Shigeru Miyamoto.

With out him gaming would of died mario bros. saved gaming.

pink Wrote:Yes, I've found that a lot of Sony's games have focused on difficulty and the gameplay collasped because of this. As for Microsoft... they just need to be educated on game creation.

I'd have to disagree with both of these. There are a lot of Sony's games out there that yes, focuses on difficulty, but also has great gameplay. I play all three systems myself and Microsoft may not be the best on game creation, but still has created many great games.

The good Mircrosoft games I've played are AOE2 and TA.

sony blew N64 out of the water..... sega did well up until the DC, it seemed the least known of all game systems.. nintendo seems to always be struggling to keep up... like with GC.. it got its ass kicked by X box AND PS2
and i have a feeling that the "revolution" willl too....


SONY... for the abundance of RPGs, then X box.... for Halo n halo 2, then nintendo and sega for lagging behind.... sega will always be loved for sonic and PSO though....