+- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Archives (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Archived Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+---- Forum: Phantasy Star Common Room (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=73)
+----- Forum: Hacks & Cheats (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=62)
+----- Thread: Not Good... (/showthread.php?tid=4587)
Not Good... - Anti Hacker - 02-03-2005
yeah but each one would have to be monitored, well , in theorey anyway
Not Good... - Scott Bull - 03-03-2005
Not really, you could argue that it's up to the owner of the SHIP to take responsibilty for it, anyhow, all the lobby's and games are logged anyhow.
Not Good... - Anti Hacker - 03-03-2005
Ah yes, this is true. Well they would at lest have to look at the loggs at the end of each day to make sure no one is using isolation to cheat and avoid being handed over to ST by other players.
Not Good... - Scott Bull - 03-03-2005
It'd be up to the owner of each ship to report any abnormalities, and the MY SHIP would only be active when the owner was online, this would minimise bandwidth use too.
Not Good... - Anti Hacker - 04-03-2005
Well you wouldnt hand yourself over would you foolio
Thats why they'd still have to be monitored!
Not Good... - Scott Bull - 05-03-2005
You woulnd't be responsbile for any wrong doings, they would.
Not Good... - Anti Hacker - 05-03-2005
well if theyd be responsible, theyd have to minitor you to make sure they dont get into trouble over it.
Not Good... - Scott Bull - 06-03-2005
That'd be covered as part of the ToS, that'd like saying they'd check your character to make sure you ain't using any illegal items, they'd trust you, foolishly, but they'd trust you.
Not Good... - Anti Hacker - 06-03-2005
That could result in more problems for pso, i dont think itd be worth it.
Not Good... - Scott Bull - 06-03-2005
Plus it'd mean Sega would have to actually do some work for a change.