+- Ragol.co.uk Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Community (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Gaming (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+--- Thread: Better? (/showthread.php?tid=3083)
Pages:
1
2
Better? - Archer - 05-09-2004
flickynick Wrote:The only ting i dislike about multiplayer is the chalice, we always have an argument as to who has to carry it. And then for the sake of playing the game i always give in
lol, just put it down somewhere and let the rest of your party die ^_^, that way one of them will grab it eventually ^_~
Better? - flickynick - 05-09-2004
Ha, gud one. When i play with my friends once they all died. I went through the whole of the levelon my own, cos my friends died and i couldn't find the life spell, it was funny
Better? - sliced bread - 05-09-2004
crystal chronicals was only good in multiplayer, i want a game thats as good multiplayer as it is singleplayer...so zelda all the way....
Better? - flickynick - 05-09-2004
I haven't played four swords because there hasn't been a PAL release yet, but im looking forward to it, i always lay multiplayer with my compodrays
Better? - sliced bread - 05-09-2004
if its anything like the gba four swords it should be good, i just hope its longer....
Better? - Heavy_Arsenal - 06-09-2004
4 sword multiplayer is the best as the dead players can change the game by grabbing the others and hitting buttons such as the lava level
Better? - flickynick - 06-09-2004
sliced bread Wrote:if its anything like the gba four swords it should be good, i just hope its longer....Me and my friend completed 4 swords in one night, for the gba, and it definately needs to be longer, he can't wait for it either
Better? - Hawk - 15-09-2004
i've always liked Zelda games, even when i was really little so four swords gets my vote!
-Hawk