+- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Archives (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Archived Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+---- Forum: Phantasy Star Online (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=68)
+----- Forum: Episodes 1 & 2 and Blue Burst (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+------ Forum: Item Findings (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+------ Thread: negative %'s on weapons (/showthread.php?tid=4870)
negative %'s on weapons - dnd - 08-01-2005
i found a gultey light with 2 -5%'s is this rare(takked down 10%)
negative %'s on weapons - Orphen - 08-01-2005
Yeah. That's good. The most a weapons percent can be tekked to is either -15% of the normal percent it had, or +15%...Heh. I tend to Tekk alot with my rare common weapons.
negative %'s on weapons - Entei - 09-01-2005
same here if it's a good weapon the you just must get the highest % possible and it's cheap 100 mesta a tec, it's pennys. i hate the -% they are rubbish, hate them bloody negtives.
negative %'s on weapons - Hrith - 10-01-2005
Orphen Wrote:The most a weapons percent can be tekked to is either -15% of the normal percent it had, or +15%No, it's +/-10%
negative %'s on weapons - Orphen - 11-01-2005
Really? I could have sworn that I tekked one of my items to 15+. Guess it must have been at -5% on the first tekk.
negative %'s on weapons - Teh EkwEE - 11-01-2005
:S
yes you should know it's only 10% Orphen *scowls* 
negative %'s on weapons - Orphen - 13-01-2005
Regardless of how much most like to think, I don't know everything about PSO. Just the majority.
negative %'s on weapons - Vincent Rayne - 13-01-2005
i found a -85 in challenge mode...
highest i've ever seen...
as far as real gameplay...
i beleive -15 is the lowest it gets...
not sure...
negative %'s on weapons - Hrith - 13-01-2005
are you on GC or Xbox ?
Percents in Challenge cannot be negative.
And -5% is the lowest you can get, from tekking a 5% to -10%
negative %'s on weapons - Vincent Rayne - 14-01-2005
i was wrong it was positive...
gc...