+- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Archives (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Archived Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+---- Forum: Phantasy Star Online (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=68)
+----- Forum: Episodes 1 & 2 and Blue Burst (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+------ Forum: Hunters Guild (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+------- Forum: Hunter (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=41)
+------- Thread: HUcast Vs. RAcast (/showthread.php?tid=6405)
Pages:
1
2
HUcast Vs. RAcast - ShadowTrickster - 03-05-2005
Kefka.....you do know almost everything about pso....but....i have a lv 200 Hucast....so I'd personally go with that....(mainly because hunters can use the dark flow!)......at any rate.....HUcast....good for attack points...bad for accuracy points.....the exact opposite for RAcast's...not EXACT but you get the idea.......i hope......
HUcast Vs. RAcast - zero132132 - 03-05-2005
Hmmm... I think we have a hacker on our hands. Anywho, I personally like HUcast better but I can see the advantages of RAcast. Of course, the whole comparison is a bit odd as Kefka said because of the fact that they are two different classes entirely (hunter v. ranger) and as such, it isn't as easy to compare.
HUcast Vs. RAcast - Qegola - 04-05-2005
Agreed. Rangers excel at things Hunters can't even do, and vice versa. Sure, RAcasts have advantages in ATA, obviously, but HUcasts deal alot more damage and can equip many weapons that are more powerful.
Plus, HUcasts look a hell of a lot cooler.
HUcast Vs. RAcast - TheUnnamedOne - 04-05-2005
Then again rangers are good at along distance, meaning that they deal a large amount of damage to a hunter before they can attack back (providing of course that they aren't using guns also) but Hunters can do more damage close range, so if the ranger don't finish him off then the HUnter wins...
well in my eyes anyway