![]() |
|
What would you like? - Printable Version +- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk) +-- Forum: Ragol.co.uk Matters (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Ragol.co.uk Feedback (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=75) +--- Thread: What would you like? (/showthread.php?tid=10845) |
What would you like? - K_I_R_E_E_K - 23-08-2007 that would be good.... hey lee the armor screens are coming, just a few hours and i will do the screen capture (after work )
What would you like? - Rena - 19-09-2007 For the forum, how about a debating section? What would you like? - K_I_R_E_E_K - 19-09-2007 Rena Wrote:For the forum, how about a debating section?general chat or the chat feature is good for that i think.
What would you like? - pink - 20-09-2007 Increase the freakin' avatar size limits... =@.@= 80x80 is fine, but 15kb is so small that your average 80x80 PNG format image is too large, let it be 30-50kb or so... They're just avatars after all. I can't even use my 19.8kb, 80x80 avatar cause "Remote file is too large". That's when trying to link to it from Photobucket. What would you like? - K_I_R_E_E_K - 20-09-2007 do converting to jpeg file tipe affects your image quality? try and cut the image, instead of 80x80, do it 78x78 or so to reduce size What would you like? - pink - 21-09-2007 Uh uh, I refuse to make 3 copies of the same image (one's its original size, the other is 80x80 which is used for most purposes) just because Ragol's size limit is so tiny. Yes JPEG does harm image quality. Being reduced down to a fraction of its original size already makes my avatars lose a lot of quality, I don't need to save as a JPEG to make it worse. What would you like? - dnd - 22-09-2007 nice (forgot name, but the EP4 verson of SandY) shot, nice lighting and stuff, might use it lee?
|