+- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Banter (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: The Void (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Thread: Game: Siggy rating game. (/showthread.php?tid=7427)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
Game: Siggy rating game. - sesshoumaru - 20-08-2005
okay then i thought by what i said would explain what kind of rating id give it but since you must see it ^1.
Game: Siggy rating game. - Sebastian - 21-08-2005
K_I_R_E_E_K Wrote:explain...
7...just words.
um... im just saying they rock. they rock solid. (i like them, not they are good)
and im gonna try to say this without flaming but phantom most people say humars suck mostly because of their reputation, seeing that noobs usually pick them, they were way over used and over powered in dc (still overused now, although i see hucasts tons more) and i forgot what i was gonna say -_-. anyway the only statistic ways they are bad is that they have no s/d, so what if they dont have s/d? j/z is almost exactly the same! i dont know why people rely on s/d so much you hardly ever see people use j/z and it is just as good... their ata is a tad lacking (so is all the other hunters but hucaseal), mst isnt great; but who cares hunters arent made for mst except huney. and the all to common saying which i extremely disagree about: "humars are weak for hunters" how are they weak... they are the second strongest in the game for god sake, they most certainly are not weak... and their stats arent bad to me. because ata (mag can fix that), mst lacking (mag can fix but they dont need).. and no s/d. wohoo three things... look at fomars... they suck at everything. look at hucaseals they suck more than humars by far... fomarls suck at more things... so they are better than at least three people XD... and humars can hold their own. now you wil most likely say "shutup noob" like most other people. but i dont mind go head.
oh yeah and phantom, is my sig really that ugly? :S
10 Family guy is teh roxorz.
Game: Siggy rating game. - whiteninja - 22-08-2005
Try to stay on the topic of signatures..... and by the way, Sebastian: 0/10. It breaks the rules because it's too long
(and it has a Panda 
)
Game: Siggy rating game. - Sebastian - 22-08-2005
god dangit. i thought it might be too long.
too lazy to change it though. and im not gonna change it till a staff member tells me -_-.
Game: Siggy rating game. - A.S. - 22-08-2005
1/10, over 5 lines >_> and why is the Panda humping the huge panda ?this is why I gav it the 1 point XD
Game: Siggy rating game. - K_I_R_E_E_K - 22-08-2005
2/10 only 3 words
sorry sebastian about that "explain that"
Game: Siggy rating game. - Jimbo1990 - 22-08-2005
5/10 kirrek pic looks cool but a bit bland
Game: Siggy rating game. - K_I_R_E_E_K - 22-08-2005
angry....i like that
8/10
i'm thinking of changing the sig, i'm just colecting the right images to produce my sig.
a sig is not only images.
Game: Siggy rating game. - Jimbo1990 - 22-08-2005
I hope your new sig boosts the 5/10 to at LEAST 8/10 there you have a goal
Game: Siggy rating game. - K_I_R_E_E_K - 22-08-2005
still 8
i hope so.