![]() |
|
Fomar vs Fomarl - Printable Version +- Ragol.co.uk Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk) +-- Forum: Phantasy Star Online (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=77) +--- Forum: Hunters Guild (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +---- Forum: Force (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=43) +---- Thread: Fomar vs Fomarl (/showthread.php?tid=3008) |
Fomar vs Fomarl - Orphen - 10-09-2004 flickynick Wrote:I swear its a dress, it looks more like a dress than a robe and they look good in it It's a robe dammit. Look at what FOmarls are wearing. THAT's a dress. Look at what FOmars are wearing. THAT looks nothing like it. It's a ROBE >< Fomar vs Fomarl - flickynick - 10-09-2004 Why do they have a frilly bit on some of them then? :S Fomar vs Fomarl - Orphen - 10-09-2004 You don't see Fomars waddling around the lobbies like FOmarls.
Fomar vs Fomarl - flickynick - 10-09-2004 They walk around like a man in a dress Fomar vs Fomarl - Ivan - 10-09-2004 It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... It's a robe.......... IT'S A ROBE Fomar vs Fomarl - Orphen - 10-09-2004 Indeed it is, I will now be making a poll for this. XD Rock on. *Poofs* Fomar vs Fomarl - flickynick - 10-09-2004 I already made a topic but i forgot the poll, cos my comp glitched Fomar vs Fomarl - Sheik - 10-09-2004 This is rather comical reading everybody arguing about this. OK, I'll settle this to where it can be clearly seen. FOmars are better in fighting alone: they have ATP - 1002 DFP - 470 MST - 1340 ATA - 163 EVP - 651 LCK - 100 _________ FOmarls are better in support but are weaker in their endurance and ability to use weapons. They have: ATP 872 DFP 498 MST 1284 ATA 170 EVP 588 LCK 100 ---------------- It's all basically a matter of personal preference that determines which is better. Fomar vs Fomarl - Mirinee - 11-09-2004 Yey, thanks, Sheik and Orphen, for verifying the maxed defense stats and the weapon swing speed. LOL. You guys decide that the dress/robe topic is so important that it needs a separate thread! I think it's a dress, but I truly wish that it were a robe. And they do not have pants under their robes, Orphen. It's just boots and then hollowness *is embarrassed to admit that she'd looked up their robes*. I'll also have to disagree with flickynick to say that they look good in robes, not dresses. The frilly bits on some of the "robes" are rather disturbing. Why, Sonic Team, why? Personal preference, yes, but I remember something else about a FOmarl: you get treated a bit better when you're online. I had both a FOmar and a FOmarl, and when they were at low levels, I played both characters in much the same way, the only way: as support. But for some reason, my poor FOmar was often unjustly insulted; I can't work out why! Maybe it's this: if you're a guy, you should be a FOmar, and a girl, a FOmarl. This way, you'll ... role-play better? But I still like FOmars more! *Digs self into a hole*. :$ Fomar vs Fomarl - Orphen - 11-09-2004 Mirinee Wrote:Yey, thanks, Sheik and Orphen, for verifying the maxed defense stats and the weapon swing speed. I've seen up the FOmars robe a many times and they DO have pants underneath, do the online lobby keyboard dying thingy, I think it is CTRL and M, and you can see perfectly they indeed do have pants. Haha, but for FOmarls they have like nothing, just feet attached to a dress (Explaining why they waddle so much).And You get treated better as a fOmarl because you are a female character and EVERYONE wants to get their hands on you, as opposed to being a guy. >.> |