![]() |
|
Testing new sig - Printable Version +- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk) +-- Forum: Banter (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: The Void (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Thread: Testing new sig (/showthread.php?tid=1266) |
Testing new sig - Mini_Bert - 03-03-2004 lol then just call me mini bert...or albert, either one, it dont really matter Testing new sig - Faulkie - 03-03-2004 Mini_Bert Wrote:lol then just call me mini bert...or albert, either one, it dont really matterGotcha, Albert... nah, mini Bert sounds better...
Testing new sig - Lee-yoshi - 03-03-2004 GOLDIE Wrote:Look at the guy go! LMAO, nice little animation there GOLDIE! I saw it a few times before but didn't know it was yours!
Testing new sig - Faulkie - 04-03-2004 Who likes my new signature? Testing new sig - GOLDIE - 04-03-2004 Lee-yoshi Wrote:LMAO, nice little animation there GOLDIE! I saw it a few times before but didn't know it was yours!Who said it was mine :confused: . Testing new sig - Faulkie - 02-04-2004 Who likes mine? Is it too big? A bit revealing? (it's covered up) Please tell me (I don't want to break the rules) Testing new sig - decswxaqz - 02-04-2004 It seems freewebs doesn't like offsite linking. And it's fine . But it'd be quite big with all that text too.... if you get rid of a few lines that'll be ok
Testing new sig - Faulkie - 02-04-2004 how many lines plus the picture? Is the pic definitely ok? Testing new sig - Faulkie - 02-04-2004 Ok I changed the pic. Is this still ok? Testing new sig - decswxaqz - 02-04-2004 hmm this pic is a bit more risque.... your old one was better. If you have your old picture, and 3 lines of text it should be ok ![]() ... I'm going to have to change mine o_O |