Metal vs. Splinter - Printable Version +- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk) +-- Forum: Banter (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Chat (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Metal vs. Splinter (/showthread.php?tid=3331)

Metal vs. Splinter - Hawk - 15-09-2004 i heard that people were really debating on who was the better infiltrater, snake or sam fisher. so who do you think it is? -Hawk Metal vs. Splinter - flickynick - 15-09-2004 Snake, because he can put people in lockers and throw them over railings into the sea, and thats enough for me Metal vs. Splinter - Hawk - 15-09-2004 i say snake because he's a classic and still kicks butt! Sam sucks the first time i played his game i thought it was going to be cool but i was unrealistic, like when he did the splits in the ally fake. Metal gear is more realistic. -Hawk Metal vs. Splinter - Dkgamer - 15-09-2004 Metal gear is by far a greater the greater series so i say Snake by a mile. Cant wait for MGS3 Metal vs. Splinter - sliced bread - 16-09-2004 both characters and their games blow hard...so neither... Metal vs. Splinter - Hawk - 16-09-2004 i think that snake on gamecube is cooler than the one on playstation because he is more agile, i actually wanted to watch the movies on twin snakes! -Hawk Metal vs. Splinter - Ash L-M - 16-09-2004 Metal Gear Solid has a decent story line and is much deeper and more emotional than the splinter cell storyline. Splinter cell has less of a storyline, but is much more realistic than I find MGS to be. For this reason, I think they’re both good, but splinter cell 2 on x-box live makes Sam Fisher cooler