Posts: 2,834
Threads: 101
Joined: Oct 2004
Gah, I simply think that the max. avatar siz limit should be at the very least raised to 90x90 pixels, and to 100x100 if possible. I've always thought that 100x100 is small, but 80x80 (the current) is quite small I think. It's fine the way it is, but....
Anyways, who else thinks it might be a good idea to have this change?
Posts: 2,150
Threads: 127
Joined: Apr 2004
Be grateful these aren't the size of EZboard ones... which are way smaller x_X
Posts: 2,747
Threads: 105
Joined: Apr 2003
The site has been tailored quite a lot to make it viewable for even the smallest resolutions. Whilst this has been a help for some it's also been a pain for others (you try making maps that still look ok on the guides section at tichy proportions). lol. I've always hated that but meh, it'd be a pain to change the main site....
anyway. I'm talking rubbish. I'll pass it on to Sol and see what he says.
Posts: 817
Threads: 127
Joined: Mar 2003
dec has answered the question really, if you want to cutomise your posts further then by all means put an image in your signatures.
Posts: 2,834
Threads: 101
Joined: Oct 2004
Ok then. I've got my answer. Thanks.