04-06-2005, 02:18 AM
Well you aren't talking to Kefka apparantly. ¬_¬
Kefka, if you play with a HUmar and a HUnewearl, at the same level, the same number of power mats used, the same weapon, and the same level of shifta, who does more damage? If a HUnewearl is doing more damage it's because of their weapon or material usage (which is another point entirely). Perhaps it's coincidence because so many new people choose HUmars, and also don't know how to plan stats. I didn't, when I made my first few characters. When my card got wiped, I re-planned my first characters; my HUmar's stats will all be maxed should he ever get to 200, and thus when he hits max ATP, he'd do more damage than a max-ATP HUnewearl with the same weaponry and shifta level.
You make no sense when you say FOmar sucks, yet is fun, and then say HUmar sucks and (basically) can never be fun. "What sucks" in your opinion is just that: an opinion... and no more of it is fact than how much "fun" you believe a character to be. Not all advantages can be measured on paper! Therefore, saying a character sucks just because its stats aren't the best is stupid. If you want to make this a game of perfection, no one's stopping you, but don't cover the characters of people who aren't going for perfection with a single blanket statement.
Kefka, if you play with a HUmar and a HUnewearl, at the same level, the same number of power mats used, the same weapon, and the same level of shifta, who does more damage? If a HUnewearl is doing more damage it's because of their weapon or material usage (which is another point entirely). Perhaps it's coincidence because so many new people choose HUmars, and also don't know how to plan stats. I didn't, when I made my first few characters. When my card got wiped, I re-planned my first characters; my HUmar's stats will all be maxed should he ever get to 200, and thus when he hits max ATP, he'd do more damage than a max-ATP HUnewearl with the same weaponry and shifta level.
You make no sense when you say FOmar sucks, yet is fun, and then say HUmar sucks and (basically) can never be fun. "What sucks" in your opinion is just that: an opinion... and no more of it is fact than how much "fun" you believe a character to be. Not all advantages can be measured on paper! Therefore, saying a character sucks just because its stats aren't the best is stupid. If you want to make this a game of perfection, no one's stopping you, but don't cover the characters of people who aren't going for perfection with a single blanket statement.
![[Image: sig_040507.gif]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v97/clanorb2003/nomad/sig_040507.gif)