21-08-2005, 03:52 AM
K_I_R_E_E_K Wrote:explain...
7...just words.
um... im just saying they rock. they rock solid. (i like them, not they are good)
and im gonna try to say this without flaming but phantom most people say humars suck mostly because of their reputation, seeing that noobs usually pick them, they were way over used and over powered in dc (still overused now, although i see hucasts tons more) and i forgot what i was gonna say -_-. anyway the only statistic ways they are bad is that they have no s/d, so what if they dont have s/d? j/z is almost exactly the same! i dont know why people rely on s/d so much you hardly ever see people use j/z and it is just as good... their ata is a tad lacking (so is all the other hunters but hucaseal), mst isnt great; but who cares hunters arent made for mst except huney. and the all to common saying which i extremely disagree about: "humars are weak for hunters" how are they weak... they are the second strongest in the game for god sake, they most certainly are not weak... and their stats arent bad to me. because ata (mag can fix that), mst lacking (mag can fix but they dont need).. and no s/d. wohoo three things... look at fomars... they suck at everything. look at hucaseals they suck more than humars by far... fomarls suck at more things... so they are better than at least three people XD... and humars can hold their own. now you wil most likely say "shutup noob" like most other people. but i dont mind go head.
oh yeah and phantom, is my sig really that ugly? :S
10 Family guy is teh roxorz.
