23-08-2005, 09:27 PM
hunters with hit% weapons out do rangers. As for people who think hunters shouldnt use guns, you're only saying that because you know that if they do they will kick your rangers but! 
The only reason it might be a bad idea with a hucast is that their special attacks arent as good, and vulcans are reduced (multi hitter) but you forget that charge cannot be reduced by either of the above reasons and so with good hit will always beat a ranger, every time! What would you rather have,someone who can accurately hit low to moderate damage, or someone who can fairly accurately hit extremely high damage at range? I know my vote goes with hunter, because theoretically if a hunter and ranger both have the same weapon at the same level with hit even if its mechs the hunter will still be more powerful.
The only reason it might be a bad idea with a hucast is that their special attacks arent as good, and vulcans are reduced (multi hitter) but you forget that charge cannot be reduced by either of the above reasons and so with good hit will always beat a ranger, every time! What would you rather have,someone who can accurately hit low to moderate damage, or someone who can fairly accurately hit extremely high damage at range? I know my vote goes with hunter, because theoretically if a hunter and ranger both have the same weapon at the same level with hit even if its mechs the hunter will still be more powerful.
-