25-10-2005, 07:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 25-10-2005, 08:01 AM by Scott Bull.)
People who dupe for "back-up" I consider to be Quasi-Legit, I've lot really rare items due to FSOD and not whinged about it, but then again, I'm 21, and just play it as a game, and realise a weapon is just a bit of coding.
I think people who dupe for this should be classified as Quasi-Legit, as I do not consider myself the same as them, it's degrading myself in essence, that's like saying I have total respect for artists when I copy a CD, I never state that, though I will never copy a CD of a artist I really admire, such as Bon Jovi, so I consider people who never burn a CD better than me, (even though there are loopholes that make it legal, I don't make out that I'm bigger than I am or anything).
Also, what about people who use anti-FSOD codes on AR, are they still hackers and less respectful than a legit, if d*ck-wads didn't FSOD, there would be no need for anti-codes, by definition, these people would fall into the legit catagory, because they're protecting themselves, (as duping weapons for "back-up"), because some people don't respect others onling gaming enjoyment.
I think people who dupe for this should be classified as Quasi-Legit, as I do not consider myself the same as them, it's degrading myself in essence, that's like saying I have total respect for artists when I copy a CD, I never state that, though I will never copy a CD of a artist I really admire, such as Bon Jovi, so I consider people who never burn a CD better than me, (even though there are loopholes that make it legal, I don't make out that I'm bigger than I am or anything).
Also, what about people who use anti-FSOD codes on AR, are they still hackers and less respectful than a legit, if d*ck-wads didn't FSOD, there would be no need for anti-codes, by definition, these people would fall into the legit catagory, because they're protecting themselves, (as duping weapons for "back-up"), because some people don't respect others onling gaming enjoyment.