Lionheart Wrote:why ive played a FOnewm and a FOnewearl for about 120 levels plus a HUcaseal for 164 and a HUmar for 157 not to mention my RAmar/RAmarl for 110 levels and a HUnewearl for 102. I dont have the room or the want to raise a crappy FOmar, the game even rates him as the worst. Ive had my fill of FOs (and leveling in general). I can see just from max stats that the FOmar is not much better than the FOnewm so i have enough experience with a FOmar technically, i also know they dont get magic boosts (other than S and D) so i know my FOnewm is a better fighter with magic and almost as good as him in melee BUT no FO should fight anyway, they just get themselves killed too much and after awhile i stop reviving people who play like idiots, i need my moons to feed to my mag.
EDIT: one last thing, i just looked up the gamefaqs max stat FAQ and its kinda funny how Junons guide looks exactly like the FOmar guide at gamefaqs....hmmmmm interesting developments.
EDIT 2: Sorry for being an ass you guys, i just woke up and im not exactly in a good mood. My point still stands but dont take it so bad as i originally wrote it. I never debated if the FOmar had no potential as a melee fighter, im just saying that a FO shouldnt do it in a team of people, especially if theyre HUs in the group.
How does the game rate him as the worst?
They DO get other bonuses than S+D, he gets a Grants bonus and a bonus for all GI Techs, i promise!
Why accuse me of copying ? ;\ I write all my guides myself. I dont see how you can compare a max stat guide with a damage output guide anyway o_O
I dont know why you hate FOmars and think they suck so much... :[ Mine does just fine...
![[Image: junsig.gif]](http://www.ragol.co.uk/stuff/junsig.gif)
Val - HUmar - Redria - Level 67
GC#22762574

