Posts: 3,143
Threads: 74
Joined: Apr 2005
I agree with Forge.For now,at least,i don't have access to online PSO unless i download BB.This game directly concerns PSO,and therefore it should be allowed to be posted here.Many people advertise their websites in their sigs,me included.If it is bad to make one thread about a site,then how bad is it with the people that have links in their sigs?A lot of people post 5,10,20 times a day,in different threads.That means their site is getting publicity everywhere.You can't ban someone for that,and if you did,most of Ragol would be gone.
My advice is to think before you act.
Posts: 2,607
Threads: 109
Joined: Oct 2004
28-02-2006, 11:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-02-2006, 11:19 PM by Teh EkwEE.)
No, it's unwarranted because that profile was only made to advertise that site, if he's an active member, than I have no problem with it. But he isn't, he posted one thing, THAT, to advertise the community he's a part of. If it was a normal person advertising, say, PSOWorld, then yes a warning would be the issue. IF that person advertised and neglected to read the rules. It's the same goddamn thing as if someone advertised rotten.com. True, it has relevance to PSO, that is a valid point, but advertising is advertising. And that warrants a warning at the least. Creating a profile on this site for that expressed purpose is warrant for banning. If he didn't know, like I said, then we'd respond: "Put that in your sig and don't let it happen again. 1 warning." But it was registered for the intent of advertising. Don't dare to accuse me of not using common sense before I posted that. I thought for a good 35 minutes on what I should do....I used common sense and that's what I came up with.
Jarl: 'Politically correct'? Do you know how many times I've been called down for the exact opposite? More times than I care to count. So how 'bout we think about what we (as in you) think before we type semi-flame bait towards a Mod that IS grounds for warning/banning depending on severity. So that's my politically correct way of me telling you to go shove it up your ass.
Anti-Hacker: YAH RLY!?!?
Don't any of you confuse me for some idiot. You all should know I'm the most laid back of the mods and the last to get on any body with any sort of threats. That's all I've got to say. If one of the other Mods wants to lock this, so be it, but I'm done with the issue.
Edit: Note he uses PC v 1 and still only has one post.....
![[Image: logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg]](http://www.nintendo.fi/images/logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg)
"How fortunate for those in power that people do not think"-Adolf Hitler
Posts: 3,467
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2004
About him having one post... Do you know how many people have only one post because they asked a question in a thread and never bothered to check it? Do you know how many people have 0 posts? (541; I checked.)
Really though, this thread could be locked now... everyone who would bother to try it has the link already. I think that this would actually merit it's own forum section though, seeing as how it is PSO, and how it is a completely different PSO.
Teh EkwEE Wrote:Don't any of you confuse me for some idiot.
No one's confusing you for anything. (Sorry, I had to say it! It was the perfect set-up.

)
Too legit to quit.
Posts: 728
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2005
whiteninja Wrote:About him having one post... Do you know how many people have only one post because they asked a question in a thread and never bothered to check it? Do you know how many people have 0 posts? (541; I checked.)
Really though, this thread could be locked now... everyone who would bother to try it has the link already. I think that this would actually merit it's own forum section though, seeing as how it is PSO, and how it is a completely different PSO.
No one's confusing you for anything. (Sorry, I had to say it! It was the perfect set-up.
)
lol... sorry... ._.
540 of those are mine .o.
i think its about time for a lock, but please don't delete this thread because i plan on trying this so called "indocron" out soon.
Posts: 2,607
Threads: 109
Joined: Oct 2004
I have not the power to lock this thread....Pm Kef or Ria.
![[Image: logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg]](http://www.nintendo.fi/images/logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg)
"How fortunate for those in power that people do not think"-Adolf Hitler
Posts: 3,467
Threads: 69
Joined: Oct 2004
Of course you don't. If you did, you would have locked it to begin with. If this thread should be locked, either Kekfa or Ria will do it by their own judgment. That is their job as Mods.
Has anyone gotten to Dark Falz yet on Indocron? (I have never seen the Dragon.)
Too legit to quit.
Posts: 728
Threads: 26
Joined: Dec 2005
but i dont think kef or ria are active anymore D:.
i still haven't got my verification code. i checked "bulk" but it's not there either...
Posts: 2,298
Threads: 101
Joined: Jul 2003
MarioVet Wrote:lol... sorry... ._.
540 of those are mine .o.
i think its about time for a lock, but please don't delete this thread because i plan on trying this so called "indocron" out soon.
Bookmark it then.
Quote:but i dont think kef or ria are active anymore D:
I've seen kefka around, ria I havent seen post in a good while
"An eye for an eye makes whole world blind" - Gandhi
Posts: 3,415
Threads: 88
Joined: Mar 2005
so ekwee, your saying if he made a topic called "New Web Game: Phantasy Star Online Indocron" then in the post said 'look at my sig' and then put everything in his sig, that would be ok?
Posts: 2,298
Threads: 101
Joined: Jul 2003
jarl Wrote:so ekwee, your saying if he made a topic called "New Web Game: Phantasy Star Online Indocron" then in the post said 'look at my sig' and then put everything in his sig, that would be ok?
I dont think thats what he meant. I think he meant it'd be ok to have it in his sig, but not make a topic advertising it.
"An eye for an eye makes whole world blind" - Gandhi