Ramar or Ramarl

[A.S.]

whys that? RAcasts look cooler, sound really cool and have more ATP. all RAcaseal have is highest DFP.

Defense, stat growth, animations, EVP, and the looks is more IMO based.

i can see were seb is coming from and i would agree but HUcasts have quicker hp growth, so until you get to lvl 180ish racasts have less hp.

HUcast have the best HP growth until L170, where RAcasts take over.

[Sebastian]

>_>

o well im going to make a racast anyway.

cuz they fuxing own like hell

edit: woops size 0 isnt nearly as small as psobb boards is >_.

[MegamanX]

RAcaseal is pretty hard to solo, but very good online. Buff, can be increased in damage and even more Defense, and... well a buff character with alot of HP, DFP, ATP (after s/d) along w/traps and the ability to use the Ra weapons... is a very nice character to have. But alone I wouldn't recomend.

RAmarls is great solo, but is also great online... RAmarl and HUnewearl are just a step below the forces as far as support goes. But if you have a force on your team, you're not as great then... but you still have alot of ATP and ATA, plus a Forces S/D... when a force is out of your immediate resta range... you still have outstanding resta for being RAmarl.

RAmar... eh, well he's the HUmar of Rangers, very nice ATP, best ATA (not HUmar... but meh), so so HP, and can atleast use S/D. Might only be 15, but because S/D works on a % factor... if you have high ATP/DFP to begin with... S/D anything will make a difference. RAmar is definately better online, but can still solo decently.

RAcast is teh ubber buffness. HP, DFP, ATP, decent ATA (as far as rangers go),... get's more ATP than HUnewearl... hehe. Outstanding Ranger for online game play.

[Teh EkwEE]

The debate is on RAmar/RAmarl.....and RAmarl> RAmar in every way. Screw FOrce support, RAmar still owns it's male counter part. Plus she looks better, and is far more able to solo/multi with her supporting herself or others when the FOrce is away/out of range.

[jarl]

RAmar are able to use HU weapons at an earlier level that RAmarls....

not quite ever yway

[Teh EkwEE]

Yeah, everyway. You don't need a FO really with a Madam's Umbrella. I'm glad in so many ways that I hunted Rita one. I need to hunt another for my FOmarl, but for now her Soul Eater will do. (S/D J/Z in Ult Caves makes her Soul Eater do 300+ damage with a hard attack at level 111)

[A.S.]

RAmar are able to use HU weapons at an earlier level that RAmarls....

not quite ever yway

RAmar can't use those "HU weapons" as good as RAmarl, excluding Saber, everyone under-estimates animations ._.;;

[colohue]

RAmars have big chunky things on either sides of their heads. RAmarls are just so much better.

[MegamanX]

... Again, RAmarl can play somewhat of a Forces role while playing multi, can solo extremely well... but when a Force is in the game, and you have a RAmar and a RAmarl with that supporting Force... the RAmar has the advantage. The lvl.30 S/D along with the higher ATP, DFP, ATA, and HP gives him quite a good advantage over RAmarl. RAmarl has the greatest EVP sure, still extremely high ATA yeah, great techs and MST of course... but she's still pretty fragile... that's why she has high evasion... she can block alot, but when she gets hit it can hurt pretty good. RAmarl is a one... woman... army =/ keyword in there was one, she's better alone. If there isn't a Force... then you have 1/2 a Force =D

But enough RAmar hits, RAmar atleast has S/D 15, he's pretty well-rounded... doesn't miss much, and can melee pretty good as well. Would I pick RAmarl over RAmar? Hell yeah... but that's because I prefer the supporting role...

[Hrith]

RAmarl has way more DFP than RAmar >_>

Even in a team, RAmar is completely useless (useless, not bad). RAmarl will do anything he does, and a lot more still, especially meleeing.

I don't know if all you people only play in Forest or Cave, but in later areas, having additional support from RAmarl or HUnewearl is more than welcome, a Force can hardly handle the whole team on their own.