I used to say" just nuke em" but now i say ... let the other countrys take care of it
but then how do you know if they did it right? If you want something done right do it yourself with a competent president.
I think we have a problem
lol, thats childish. Let him do his work before doubting him. Anyone who thought war doesn't bring casualties is foolish. Just let President Bush finish what he started, then comment on his methods. and Snowulf, Nukes are out of the question. The US isnt authorized to use them unless they are severly threatened by another country.
Lol, somehow, I think that if we just nuked somone else, the entire world would be attacking us. Its called a nuclear war, that leads to a nuclear winter, that leads to the end of the world...not a pretty thing is it?
At least it would prevent the overpopulation of the world. It's probably why I want to see some kind of massacre take place in some underdeveloped country - what have they ever done for us recently?
Yeah, sure that's logical. That's only gonna' improve the U.S's image to every other country is by slaughtering an entire population. What the hell is wrong with you?
misterbud Wrote:Lol, somehow, I think that if we just nuked somone else, the entire world would be attacking us. Its called a nuclear war, that leads to a nuclear winter, that leads to the end of the world...not a pretty thing is it?
lol, end of the world, maybe but I think that some of us would survive or something that could evolve into something new ^_^. who knows, it might be better that way, maybe our predecessors would be so foolish
.
mimas Wrote:At least it would prevent the overpopulation of the world. It's probably why I want to see some kind of massacre take place in some underdeveloped country - what have they ever done for us recently?
thats just wrong. It doesn't matter if others are slaughtering each other just because they are under developed. Under developed countries like mexico are important in the world. Now, I know many countries take advantage of their cheap labour but we still need some of their goods. 2nd, any human life is important, no matter where they are from. I don't care if you were trying to be funny, it isn't really a topic to be laughing about.
He's right, imagine it was you. That's actually extremely racist. People from third-world countries aren't instantly from Al Queda. Every country has terrorist groups, the IRA in the UK for instance. (Although they've calmed down a bit lately...)
And also, in reply to "what have they done for us?", I add that we export many materials especially oil from these areas, and don't even give them enough money for it. So, without them, we'd actually become more like them, from lack of resource.
Serpent7 Wrote:He's right, imagine it was you. That's actually extremely racist. People from third-world countries aren't instantly from Al Queda. Every country has terrorist groups, the IRA in the UK for instance. (Although they've calmed down a bit lately...)
And also, in reply to "what have they done for us?", I add that we export many materials especially oil from these areas, and don't even give them enough money for it. So, without them, we'd actually become more like them, from lack of resource.
an equally reasonable question would be "what have we done for them lately". Just because we are in more developed societies, that doesnt make us superior to them. the reasons we are in Iraq are totally f**ked up, basically Bush's personal reasons - namely Bush family ties to Saudi oil. Bush is a freak of nature. but that's another story.
misterbud Wrote:Lol, somehow, I think that if we just nuked somone else, the entire world would be attacking us. Its called a nuclear war, that leads to a nuclear winter, that leads to the end of the world...not a pretty thing is it?
http://squizzle.com/flashview.asp?id=138
That's what I thought also... we launch one nuke and BAM the entire world is destroyed.