Forums

Is it hacking if you exept hacked stuff from someone else? Or if you get something you didnt know was hacked? I need answers so I can stay legit!

its not hacking it meens ur illegit for havin hacked items

But its hard to tell!, for all I know I used hacked Dimates! Is it your fault even if you did'nt know!

Being legit is over rated. No one is truly "legit"

Helios Wrote:Being legit is over rated. No one is truly "legit"

Erm, yes there are. What about the people that accept no items/find everything themselves. If you are doing it just for the title not because you like to play like that then by all means change.

u say no1's legit -.- im fully legit only thing others may think is not is that i go piping for rares some people think piping is illegit but thats them me i think its legit otherwise all my stuff is found by me and was gotten by me i accept nothin from others for they may be "Dupes/hacks/bankmods" you never know so for me i dont accept anything

To answer the topic maker's question, no it isn't hacking like Lee Xao Vue said. I believe that if you are completely unaware of a hacked item, then you are still legit. Some items however, like a TJS, Psycho wand, Guld or Milla even GuldMilla, that are just given away like candy, you should be extremely suspicious of. In other words, just dont take them.

The whole "legit" really is overrated. However I'd have to say that the whole "everyone not being legit" thing is false. Especially if they play offline only. How exactly are they going to be illegit then [considering if they use no cheat devices, whatsoever]. Generalizations like that shouldn't be made unless they're at least more than 50% assured.

mdbrim2004 Wrote:To answer the topic maker's question, no it isn't hacking like Lee Xao Vue said. I believe that if you are completely unaware of a hacked item, then you are still legit. Some items however, like a TJS, Psycho wand, Guld or Milla even GuldMilla, that are just given away like candy, you should be extremely suspicious of. In other words, just dont take them.

The whole "legit" really is overrated. However I'd have to say that the whole "everyone not being legit" thing is false. Especially if they play offline only. How exactly are they going to be illegit then [considering if they use no cheat devices, whatsoever]. Generalizations like that shouldn't be made unless they're at least more than 50% assured.

well said brim but im just wondering the 1st sentance i dont understand it =\
i said it wasnt hacking or are u agreeing with me sry just hard for me to understand that sentance ^_^ otherwise well put

I'm agreeing with you. lol

if you use a glitch/hack to exact gain from the game (well what else would you do?? get a loss ) then thats hacking. illegit is a bit more difficult. some people say that if you gave fair trades to get hacked/duped items that you didnt know were hacked/duped then you're still legit (just) other sacred-legits say that if you pipe you're illegit. personally, i say if you give a fair trade for something hacked/duped that you didnt have the faintest clue was hacked/duped you're still legit. i also support duping for backup (hence why i have 2 legit (in my opinion, since i'll never touch it unless i loose the first, and loosing isnt combining it with guld to make guld milla )) handgun:milla's. i do not, however, support duping crap stuff (read mags, shields+armours unless they're 4 slot pwnersisers and commonish weapons, like justy's etc, unless they have amazing %.)

as you can see, being a hacker is clear cut, though being illegit is extremely hazy.