| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 178 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 174 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Facebook, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Help
Last Post: VeraAZulauf8156
Yesterday, 12:47 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 14
|
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Cards
Last Post: VeraAZulauf8156
Yesterday, 11:24 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 9
|
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Hunters Guild
Last Post: BobbieDavis6751
08-11-2026, 09:59 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 24
|
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Hunters Guild
Last Post: BeaulahSipes16
07-11-2026, 08:04 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 43
|
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Fanworks
Last Post: AllanFLemke4854
07-11-2026, 07:59 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 53
|
Tử Vi Xem Tướng – Nền Tản...
Forum: Modes
Last Post: tuvixemtuong2
06-11-2026, 09:56 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 72
|
Unlocking Website Potenti...
Forum: Help
Last Post: LeannaFeil2006
15-10-2026, 10:18 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 176
|
Save Editor
Forum: Help
Last Post: T_T1K
27-08-2026, 12:31 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 464
|
Interview with LiquidSpik...
Forum: Updates
Last Post: T_T1K
01-05-2026, 10:58 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 951
|
Drop Tables
Forum: Items
Last Post: T_T1K
24-04-2026, 11:31 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 929
|
|
|
| Mag Help |
|
Posted by: Brian12345 - 27-07-2006, 10:17 PM - Forum: Lobby
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Is there a max level that your mag can be because my mag is lvl 200 0 IQ 120% sychro and i cant level it up anymore
|
|
|
| Help PLEASE! |
|
Posted by: Brian12345 - 26-07-2006, 09:29 PM - Forum: Lobby
- Replies (6)
|
 |
I made a second character, lvl 25, and even though i kill Volt Opt many times on single player, i am still unable to enter ruins, it is blocked, and i have talked to the principal and it is still blocked, does anyone know why
|
|
|
| In PSO today, I... |
|
Posted by: whiteninja - 26-07-2006, 06:24 PM - Forum: Items
- Replies (106)
|
 |
Official stuff:
This thread is a continuation of the previous thread, which was locked due to size limitations.
Kefka Wrote:[COLOR="DarkRed"]I'd like to emphasize that this thread is about posting your finds, this thread is not for posting your level ups, let alone for posting that you found or did nothing.
Posts considered to be spam will be dealt with according to the forum rules.
-Kefka[/COLOR]
Lee Yoshi Wrote:[EDIT] 30th October There have been a few issues brought up over how this thread is being maintained compared to "the good ol' days" so to speak! Just to note, please understand the following when using this thread in the future ^_^
Rare item findings/Rare monster findings/Character levelling/Rare weapon findings, etc. is the kind of good postage that makes this topic what it's all about - Not posts concerning how you are hunting something, or how your MAG has levelled up, because it's just silly! The thread is always seemingly being watched, and SPAM gets the deletion treatment it deserves!
Also note this thread is for all versions of Episodes I & II, being Gamecube, Xbox, SEGA Dreamcast, and Blue Burst. It might be handy for others reading the posts in this thread if you make it clear what version of PSO you found it on, but that's upto you Finally remember for all Episode IV findings, use this thread or the Episode IV board in general. Enjoy! ~ Lee-yoshi
And now, onto what I did today....
I used some of the 30+ lucky coins I collected.
|
|
|
| Sen. Specter prepping bill to sue Bush |
|
Posted by: Phantom_RAcast - 25-07-2006, 10:55 PM - Forum: Lobby
- Replies (2)
|
 |
A powerful Republican committee chairman who has led the fight against President Bush's signing statements said Monday he would have a bill ready by the end of the week allowing Congress to sue him in federal court.
"We will submit legislation to the United States Senate which will...authorize the Congress to undertake judicial review of those signing statements with the view to having the president's acts declared unconstitutional," Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said on the Senate floor.
Specter's announcement came the same day that an American Bar Association task force concluded that by attaching conditions to legislation, the president has sidestepped his constitutional duty to either sign a bill, veto it, or take no action.
Bush has issued at least 750 signing statements during his presidency, reserving the right to revise, interpret or disregard laws on national security and constitutional grounds.
"That non-veto hamstrings Congress because Congress cannot respond to a signing statement," said ABA president Michael Greco. The practice, he added "is harming the separation of powers."
Bush has challenged about 750 statutes passed by Congress, according to numbers compiled by Specter's committee. The ABA estimated Bush has issued signing statements on more than 800 statutes, more than all other presidents combined.
Signing statements have been used by presidents, typically for such purposes as instructing agencies how to execute new laws.
But many of Bush's signing statements serve notice that he believes parts of bills he is signing are unconstitutional or might violate national security.
Still, the White House said signing statements are not intended to allow the administration to ignore the law.
"A great many of those signing statements may have little statements about questions about constitutionality," said White House spokesman Tony Snow. "It never says, 'We're not going to enact the law.'"
Specter's announcement intensifies his challenge of the administration's use of executive power on a number of policy matters. Of particular interest to him are two signing statements challenging the provisions of the USA Patriot Act renewal, which he wrote, and legislation banning the use of torture on detainees.
Bush is not without congressional allies on the matter. Sen. John Cornyn (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, a former judge, has said that signing statements are nothing more than expressions of presidential opinion that carry no legal weight because federal courts are unlikely to consider them when deciding cases that challenge the same laws.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060725/ap_o...statements
|
|
|
|