![]() |
|
Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Printable Version +- Forums (https://forums.ragol.co.uk) +-- Forum: Banter (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Chat (https://forums.ragol.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder (/showthread.php?tid=4073) |
Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - redriaboy - 12-11-2004 http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/12/peterson.verdict/index.html the sicko is gonna fry! Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Gotien - 14-11-2004 kind of a tabu topic to talk about since for one it is a US case and alot of the members in here are UK so they dont know or care(more than likely) also its not even a week since it has happened, try again in a few... Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Anti Hacker - 17-11-2004 Whoa, thats some extreme comments there... (not u gotien) I dont agree with execution in any form :O Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Teh EkwEE - 18-11-2004 I don't agree in execution either. I do believe in tourture. If only for rapist and child molesters. Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Omar - 18-11-2004 Let's hope the jury, who according to that article were never presented with any firm evidence related to him killing anyone, made the right decision. If it turns out he is innocent after he is put to death (that is only a possibility at the moment it seems though), then it would be a difficult thing for them to have to deal with. Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Feline Witch - 19-11-2004 I don't believe in execution. If someone was innocent, and they go to the chair, then that is that. I feel truely dangerous people have to be killed, to protect others, but even though, executing an innocent man/woman is a wrong that can never be righted. Scott Pederson found guilty of 1st degree murder - Teh EkwEE - 19-11-2004 Even if he did do it. There was NO solid evidence. It was all circumstantial. So therefore on that fact alone it goes against all the principles that the U.S. justice system was founded on. Which is to prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that he murdered her. So without no solid evidence he shouldn't be put to death. |