03-07-2005, 05:49 PM
Free would be better (who can argue with that!) but something like £2 is still very reasonable to me.
If you think about it, you could pay £2 to download, say, Link to the Past, and you're paying £2 for a game which is almost certainly better than all the £40 games on the street. With the next Xbox and PS3 though, it seems like the games on the street might even be [a ridiculous] £60!
I'll still be remaining hopeful that Nintendo make some new snes-style games for download. They could be just as good, and much cheaper/easier to make, as they don't need to worry about ultra realistic graphics and what-not for it to sell.
If you think about it, you could pay £2 to download, say, Link to the Past, and you're paying £2 for a game which is almost certainly better than all the £40 games on the street. With the next Xbox and PS3 though, it seems like the games on the street might even be [a ridiculous] £60!
I'll still be remaining hopeful that Nintendo make some new snes-style games for download. They could be just as good, and much cheaper/easier to make, as they don't need to worry about ultra realistic graphics and what-not for it to sell.
Hey, I can still..