06-08-2005, 06:21 PM
if you use a glitch/hack to exact gain from the game (well what else would you do?? get a loss 
) then thats hacking. illegit is a bit more difficult. some people say that if you gave fair trades to get hacked/duped items that you didnt know were hacked/duped then you're still legit (just) other sacred-legits say that if you pipe you're illegit. personally, i say if you give a fair trade for something hacked/duped that you didnt have the faintest clue was hacked/duped you're still legit. i also support duping for backup (hence why i have 2 legit (in my opinion, since i'll never touch it unless i loose the first, and loosing isnt combining it with guld to make guld milla )) handgun:milla's. i do not, however, support duping crap stuff (read mags, shields+armours unless they're 4 slot pwnersisers and commonish weapons, like justy's etc, unless they have amazing %.)
as you can see, being a hacker is clear cut, though being illegit is extremely hazy.
) then thats hacking. illegit is a bit more difficult. some people say that if you gave fair trades to get hacked/duped items that you didnt know were hacked/duped then you're still legit (just) other sacred-legits say that if you pipe you're illegit. personally, i say if you give a fair trade for something hacked/duped that you didnt have the faintest clue was hacked/duped you're still legit. i also support duping for backup (hence why i have 2 legit (in my opinion, since i'll never touch it unless i loose the first, and loosing isnt combining it with guld to make guld milla )) handgun:milla's. i do not, however, support duping crap stuff (read mags, shields+armours unless they're 4 slot pwnersisers and commonish weapons, like justy's etc, unless they have amazing %.)as you can see, being a hacker is clear cut, though being illegit is extremely hazy.