21-08-2005, 10:57 PM
they are expected of fos. but they can still be better than a force that meets the expectations without meeting the expectations. and i dont think humars are "good" i know they are down there but i dont know why people have to compare chars so much. like omg hucaseals are better than humars because of 16 ata and traps. so, traps are usefulish techs are useful. it evens out it just that fools cant pull their heads out of their stereotypical asses and open their eyes and instead of saying blank is better than blank in 2 things they are both nearly equally as good, and i said nearly not are. blank1 might be beter than blank here but blank is better than blank1 here and there but blank 1 is better than them there. it evens out.
for example: (im not reading off of stat charts but bear with me hear theyre rough hypothesisis.)
def: humars>hucaseals
ata: humars<hucaseals
atp: humars>hucaseals
mst: techs>traps
evp: hucaseals>humars
hp: humars>hucaseals (dunno all i know is hucaseals have low hp for droids)
tp: out of the question
weps: same
natural abilities: hucaseal>humar
now count em up. lets see... humars:4 hucaseals:3. see? hucaseals have more ata which is important, but i said they are pretty much evened out and dead equal. so there ya have it folks.
not please can we get back on topic to mags?
for example: (im not reading off of stat charts but bear with me hear theyre rough hypothesisis.)
def: humars>hucaseals
ata: humars<hucaseals
atp: humars>hucaseals
mst: techs>traps
evp: hucaseals>humars
hp: humars>hucaseals (dunno all i know is hucaseals have low hp for droids)
tp: out of the question
weps: same
natural abilities: hucaseal>humar
now count em up. lets see... humars:4 hucaseals:3. see? hucaseals have more ata which is important, but i said they are pretty much evened out and dead equal. so there ya have it folks.
not please can we get back on topic to mags?