Nintendo Revolution

[Arrogantelf]

Lets face it guys and gals, great graphics do not sell a machine.Marketing etc does.Sony proved with playstation one that you do not need good graphics to sell a machine. PS1 became market leader because it was the sony name that attracted a huge influx of non-gamers to the market,only due to the sony name.Everyone knew the sony walkman, tv's videos etc etc, Nintendo not making these devices, so sony was already a household name.

If price rumours are to be trusted then PS3 will be way too expensive for mr and mrs person to buy said game machine for little johnny you see. only spoilt brats will get PS3 from their parents.Also anyone who understands what the cell chip really is and does will also understand that its not what its actually cracked up to be. Yes peak power figures are truely impressive but as for actual power, we will see. The cell is NOT a video game console chip ok. Its a jack of all trades master of none chip, whereas the cpu that will live inside revolution is specifically designed as a video game chip.

The PS3 is not a next gen console IMO, it is this gen with better graphics(due mainly to the gpu) no innovation at all im afraid.

Sadly it seems most people now want to play games these days filled with pre-rendered waxwork dummies as characters so go and buy the PS3 or X360 and enjoy your mannequins. Yet again the only VIDEO GAME company going next gen is Nintendo.

History will prove me right(apologies for the arrogance)