A Rena vs Anti Debate

[nomercy]

"Tis foolishness! If all were so easy, why, none would suffer in this world!"

Your ideas, which you keep replicating and replicating, stating the exact same thing in bigger words that are spelled worse, simply prove your ignorance to the evidence before you. There is not one goddamn speck of evidence for the Bible. It is pure faith alone. It is not given any proof whatsoever, there is nothing. Quote scripture for me, friend.

On the subject of Darwinism, and your ideas that it is faith...

1. Self-replication/Inheritance: Some number of entities must be capable of producing copies of themselves, and those copies must also be capable of reproduction. The new copies must inherit the traits of old ones. Sometimes the different variations are recombined in sexual reproduction. If you're too dumb to know, this means that sex produces babies, which are, when brought to the basic terminology, a collection of cells from both parties.
   
2. Variation: There must be a range of different traits in the population of entities, and there must be a mechanism for introducing new variations into the population.
   
3. Selection: Inherited traits must somehow affect the ability of the entities to reproduce themselves, either by survival (natural selection), or by ability to produce offspring by finding partners (sexual selection).

Darwinism states that any physical being, given these three traits, has a chance for natural evolution occurring. This means over a period of time, the organisms collect traits they find through their continued reproduction.

Even computers can be taken as a form of electronic Darwinism. However, there is no random selection or reproduction.

Also, Darwinism isn't the only claim to evolution of our species, and others. Lee Smolin's theory of cosmological natural selection explains how this planet was created to have the complex materials required to support life-forms such as we. It also defines the creations of universes.

I would like to add, also, that whilst religious leaders come and go without much care, scientific leaders are remembered throughout history. Richard Dawkins supports the theory of Darwinism. I recommend you read this: http://www.arn.org/docs/johnson/wid.htm before throwing around your idiotic ideas about Darwinism being for the most part false, whilst in the same breath asserting that your god had sex with a woman without breaking her hymen, as well as her falling pregnant directly after. In case you didn't know, I'm speaking of the so-called virgin Mary. I shudder to think how painful child-birth would be without previously breaking the hymen.

Now, about your sweeping assumption that people only do good due to religion. Take a look around you, moron; there are millions of people who do not believe in religion, and we don't go around committing crimes. If anything religion can be blamed for criminal activity. Look at race-hate crimes, sexist crimes, and the like, then look at how many of the antagonists in these follow a religion and use it as a get-out-of-jail-free card. I read an article not long ago, I'll see if I can find it. It was somewhat to do with religious leaders joining together in an effort to stop gay rights, naming it an affront to god. FOOLISHNESS!

You state without religion there is no need to be good, what is your problem? You're seeming more retarded with every post, your idiotic assumptions that everyone has to play nice just 'cause Jesus is coming amuse me, whilst simultaneously making me retch at the fact I must be classified as the same race as you. Your evident problem with control does not help matters, you try to police threads here just because you have a problem with other people's ideas or language. Newsflash man, this is the internet. Nobody gives two shits if they offend you or not, because you're like one of those happy-boppers. No matter how much we smash you you always bounce back with your brainless double-standards and out-dated idealistic approach to scientific concerns.

You state we are made in the image of god, show me proof. Proof that does not come from your out-dated scripture and your neo-narcissistic assumptions. Proof that can be backed up with facts and figures, not the threat of burning in a fiery pit if I do not comply to your closed-minded view on the world, as seen through your glasses tinted rose. Show me the essays and papers that prove to me that religion is in fact, more than just a bed-time story I could use to scare my son into behaving. A tale sung by the bards; we know not the author, but remember only the tale. That's all it is, friend. A tale.

There is no heaven, nor is there a hell. There is nothing when you die, no divine judgement or rites of passage through some gateway in the clouds.

~Life is a path, Death is the destination. - I Have Seen Where It Grows, Demon Hunter.

Edit: Fixed spelling and re-worded a few sentences.