A Rena vs Anti Debate

[nomercy]

Indeed, scientists' theorems can be false, but they put much more work into discovering them. I never claimed the man Jesus was false, simply the deity. Jesus himself was true, he was indeed crucified by the Romans, according to the books I've read on the subject. However everything after that, that is to say the resurrection, the floods, the parting of the Red Sea, none of it has proof enough to stand up in the history books. There simply is not commendable evidence that such things as those happened.

However, there are theorems that are quite a bit more truthful-seeming, to my ears. One example, the resurrection of Jesus. There are those who believe he was not dead when he was entombed. This would be ample proof to say that he did not in fact die there. However, there is the factor of the death certificate drawn up by the Roman emperor at that time, which states Jesus died.

Your assumption that my quotes on Darwinism are taken from Darwinist websites... I've done in-depth research on the subject myself, so I do believe I know what I'm talking about. Your aforementioned statement of "why don't you arrange a place to meet so i can kill you" is tantamount to a death threat and is, now, punishable by law. However sinceyou would have no hope of harming me, I won't take it too seriously. Yet.

If there were no God...blah blah blah. This particular sector is getting very old, very fast. I have already stated my opinion on the matter, as well as the fact there are multiple religions, which puts a sword to the throat of the one true god theory. We have claims all over the world, from different religions, of ascention and the like, your claims are nothing different.

You state that you are bored of this. As I have said earlier, either get on with it, or suck it in and go elsewhere. My 'stupid Darwinist websites' as you so idiotically name them have a large part more credentials than your holy light of god BS. Suck it in emo child. I have said, and will say again, I have no religious faith. I believe in credible evidence, I believe in truth by experimentation. God won't put food on my table, science will. The factor is that everything contains scientific worth. Without science you wouldn't even be here talking about it, you would be dead because cooking wouldn't work. Cooking depends on heating molecules of food to certain temperatures to make it ingestible.

Put bluntly, science has more uses than religion has ever had, and ever will. Religion does not feed my children, it does not educate them, it does not help them.

And your severe lack of respect for scientists irks me.