The Iraq War

[SirTom909]

SirTom is doing quite a good explaining my ideas heheh.
With the information they had (ie weapons of mass destruction) then I feel it was a legit reason to go to war. But now the information has proved to be rushed/falsified, Blair should say a clear sorry, and that we did use false information.

But on the flip side, why do you really need an excuse to get rid of someone who persecutes his own people. Of course, we can't really talk, living thousands of miles away. We don't REALLY know what's going on, apart from the media which won't give a clear, unbiased opinion. Some people liked Sadaam, some didn't. Unless you live there, you can't get a clear picture.

in Mr Blair's defence (i am a card holding member of the party) at the time, the UK's biggest Allie and friend had already made their decision, and mr B made a decision (THAT WAS APPROVED BY PARLIAMENT!!!!) with the evidence he was given, so he could either leave his allies out in the dark or he could support them knowing at thattime that saddam could do all sorts of damage with nucleat weapons.

further more, nuclear testing kits HAVE been found in Iraq but the british media are two embarrassed to broadcast the news, especially the corrupt fat cats at the BBC.