Hucast Vs Hucaseal

[Omar]

Um. Isn't this a hunters thread? I will assist.

HUnewearls- Just...no. Theyre crap. I don't even want to discuss them they suck so much. Want something better then a hunewearl, FOmar, even FOmarl.

HUcaseal- Pretty low HP, better ATP than those pitiful HUnewearls, but not as good as the HUmar and the HUcast. Low DEF, EVP is very high, ATA is practically of ranger calibur, in most cases people would tell you to simply use a ranger instead.

=/

HUnewearls/RAmarls are classed by most knowledgable players as the best classes for solo play and still great additions to a team with no decent support FO.

HUnewearls seem to be quite poor at very early levels, but at later levels they are easily one of the best classes. A hunter's ATP, ATA and DEF coupled with level 20 shifta/deband is deadly. As for HUcaseal's ATP being much better than the "pitiful" HUnewearl's, try checking the stats of a HUnewearl with level 20 shifta cast on them and then compare that with the HUcaseal's ATP

With regards to HUcaseal, their ATA isn't quite in the ranger league. Most people will tell you to use a RAcast instead because they are much better in almost all stats except EVP and have stupidly high HP, but RAmar and RAmarl would not be a decent alternative to a HUcaseal.

Yeah, but the Hucasts have pretty horrible ATA.

No they do not. As discussed earlier, all hunters' ATA is more than enough in most cases.