Posts: 1,620
Threads: 57
Joined: Jun 2004
i found a gultey light with 2 -5%'s is this rare(takked down 10%)
Currently playing:
Pso2 - ship2: Player ID "dnd"
Lv55 Fighter - Lv50 Hunter - lv38 Gunner - Lv32 Ranger
Currently hunting: Rika's claw (69 Dark Falz kills so far)
Posts: 3,580
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2003
Yeah. That's good. The most a weapons percent can be tekked to is either -15% of the normal percent it had, or +15%...Heh. I tend to Tekk alot with my rare common weapons.
Posts: 32
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2005
same here if it's a good weapon the you just must get the highest % possible and it's cheap 100 mesta a tec, it's pennys. i hate the -% they are rubbish, hate them bloody negtives.

You had better run because i will burn you to a crisp
My charcters:
SOJIN
ORAN HUmar Lv 115 Ultimate
Lightspeed
BLUEFULL FOnewm Lv65 Ultimate
Alphawolf
SKYLY HUmar Lv45 Very hard
Alphawolf
REDRIA HUmar Lv44 Very Hard
Posts: 2,389
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2004
Orphen Wrote:The most a weapons percent can be tekked to is either -15% of the normal percent it had, or +15%
No, it's +/-10%
Posts: 3,580
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2003
Really? I could have sworn that I tekked one of my items to 15+. Guess it must have been at -5% on the first tekk.
Posts: 2,607
Threads: 109
Joined: Oct 2004
:S

yes you should know it's only 10% Orphen *scowls*
![[Image: logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg]](http://www.nintendo.fi/images/logo_gc_fireemblem_medium.jpg)
"How fortunate for those in power that people do not think"-Adolf Hitler
Posts: 3,580
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2003
Regardless of how much most like to think, I don't know everything about PSO. Just the majority.
Posts: 507
Threads: 27
Joined: Jan 2005
i found a -85 in challenge mode...
highest i've ever seen...
as far as real gameplay...
i beleive -15 is the lowest it gets...
not sure...
Posts: 2,389
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2004
are you on GC or Xbox ?
Percents in Challenge cannot be negative.
And -5% is the lowest you can get, from tekking a 5% to -10%
Posts: 507
Threads: 27
Joined: Jan 2005
i was wrong it was positive...
gc...