A.S. Wrote:Many games are still being sold that lack overall quality (look at any PS game). The graphics are the only bad thing about the game.
I'm looking at several Playstation games... Final Fantasy VII, VIII, IX, Valkyrie Profile, Legend of Dragoon, Gran Turismo...
I don't see anything wrong with the graphics on the Playstation system. Granted they're not up to par with what kids like on their beloved 128-bit systems. But if you think those graphics lack quality just look at the Playstation's specifications.
I remember when I was playing my old NES and went over to a friend's house to play their Atari 2800 system. Not a huge difference in graphics, not even the SEGA Master System had any significant difference in graphics. Not untill the next generation systems, the Super Nintendo and the Genesis was there any real change with graphics. Even with 16 bit technology video game graphics were simple. Same with the first 64 bit system, the Atari Jaguar, graphics weren't anything to go nuts over.
The first change in graphics from 2D-3D (not including the Jaguar) were on the Saturn, Playstation, and that accursed Nintendo 64. More detail could be acheived, but still nowhere close to today's more complex systems.
In overall graphics performance... the Dreamcast runs circles around the Xbox, so does the GameCube, PSO is a good example of the graphical capabilities of each system.
Hell, I still play my Master System JUST to play Phantasy Star. For me the story and challenge of playing a game far outweighs the sound and graphics.